On the Issue of Argumentation and Informedness
Martin Caminada and Chiaki Sakama
2nd International Workshop on Argument for Agreement and Assurance (AAA 2015), Kanagawa, November 2015.
Abstract
In the current paper we examine how to assess knowledge and expertise
in an argumentation based setting. In particular, we are looking for a
formal criterion to determine whether one agent is more knowledgeable
than another. Several such criteria are discussed, each of which has
its own advantages and disadvantages.
Full Paper (PDF 169K)
Slide