On the Issue of Argumentation and Informedness

Martin Caminada and Chiaki Sakama

2nd International Workshop on Argument for Agreement and Assurance (AAA 2015), Kanagawa, November 2015.


In the current paper we examine how to assess knowledge and expertise in an argumentation based setting. In particular, we are looking for a formal criterion to determine whether one agent is more knowledgeable than another. Several such criteria are discussed, each of which has its own advantages and disadvantages.

Full Paper (PDF 169K) Slide