Abstract
This paper defines a general framework for testing equivalence of
logic programs with respect to two parameters.
Given two sets of rules {\cal Q} and {\cal R},
two logic programs P1 and P2 are said to be
update equivalent with respect to ({\cal Q},{\cal R})
if (P1\Q)\cup R and (P2\Q)\cup R have
the same answer sets for any two logic programs
Q\subseteq{\cal Q} and R\subseteq{\cal R}.
The notion of update equivalence is suitable to
take program updates into account when two logic programs are compared.
That is, the notion of relativity stipulates the languages of updates,
and two parameters {\cal Q} and {\cal R} correspond to
the languages for deletion and addition, respectively.
Clearly, the notion of strong equivalence is a special case of
update equivalence where {\cal Q} is empty and
{\cal R} is the set of all rules in the language.
In fact, the notion of update equivalence is strong enough to
capture many other notions such as weak equivalence,
update equivalence on common rules, and uniform equivalence.
We also discuss computation and complexity of update equivalence.
Keywords: update equivalence, strong equivalence, computational complexity
Full Paper (pdf 143K)
Slide (pdf 129K)
© Springer-Verlag